{"id":23556,"date":"2017-12-17T12:28:31","date_gmt":"2017-12-17T17:28:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.revistazetta.com\/?p=23556"},"modified":"2017-12-17T13:04:05","modified_gmt":"2017-12-17T18:04:05","slug":"216-894-millones-llego-dano-patrimonial-causado-electricaribe-indebido-uso-subsidios","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/?p=23556","title":{"rendered":"A $216.894 millones lleg\u00f3 el da\u00f1o patrimonial causado por Electricaribe"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

*Revisadas m\u00e1s de 56 millones de facturas, se encontr\u00f3 que en 48 millones se dio esta irregularidad.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

*Atl\u00e1ntico (con $58.466 millones), C\u00f3rdoba ($44.155 millones), Bol\u00edvar ($41.659 millones) y Magdalena ($21.317 millones), los departamentos m\u00e1s afectados.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Tras concluir una indagaci\u00f3n preliminar donde se revisaron m\u00e1s de 56 millones de facturas, la Contralor\u00eda General de la Rep\u00fablica cuantific\u00f3 en $216.894 millones de pesos el monto del da\u00f1o patrimonial ocasionado por la Empresa Electricaribe al hacer uso indebido de recursos por este valor, que se le giraron para subsidiar a los usuarios con menores ingresos de la regi\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

Electricaribe incurri\u00f3 en esta pr\u00e1ctica durante seis a\u00f1os continuos analizados por la Contralor\u00eda, que comprenden las vigencias julio de 2011 a julio de 2017.<\/p>\n

La empresa no aplic\u00f3 en las facturas de los usuarios, la totalidad de los descuentos correspondientes al subsidio que les otorga el Fondo de Energ\u00eda Social \u2013 FOES a la poblaci\u00f3n de los estratos\u00a01 y 2 de zonas especiales, y destin\u00f3\u00a0estos recursos a la disminuci\u00f3n de sus p\u00e9rdidas.<\/p>\n

La Contralor\u00eda Delegada de Minas y Energ\u00eda, que realiz\u00f3 esta indagaci\u00f3n preliminar, encontr\u00f3 que de 56\u00b4751.704 facturas revisadas, 48\u00b4405.622 presentan irregularidades en la asignaci\u00f3n de estos recursos.<\/p>\n

En total, usuarios de 183 municipios del mercado atendido por Electricaribe resultaron afectados.<\/p>\n

Al revisar las diferencias entre el valor del subsidio FOES que deb\u00edan recibir los usuarios y el que se les aplic\u00f3 en sus facturas por parte de Electricaribe, se encontr\u00f3 \u00a0que el departamento m\u00e1s afectado es Atl\u00e1ntico, con $58.466 millones, como se aprecia en el siguiente cuadro:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Departamento<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ATL\u00c1NTICO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 58,466,572,872<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CORDOBA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 44,155,348,029<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

BOLIVAR<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 41,659,368,101<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MAGDALENA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 21,317,758,925<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SUCRE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 19,895,274,445<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

LA GUAJIRA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 18,516,509,458<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CESAR<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 12,883,597,366<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0 216,894,429,197<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Los municipios m\u00e1s afectados en cada departamento son: Atl\u00e1ntico (Barranquilla con $30.308 millones); C\u00f3rdoba (Lorica con $10.683 millones); Bol\u00edvar (Cartagena con $19.046 millones); Magdalena (Santa Marta con $8.203 millones);\u00a0 Sucre (San Onofre con $2.453 millones); La Guajira (Maicao con $7.935 millones); y Cesar (Valledupar con $2.602 millones).<\/p>\n

En cuanto a facturas afectadas por departamento, C\u00f3rdoba encabeza este listado, con 11 millones 843 mil 228:<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Departamento<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Cantidad de Facturas Afectadas<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CORDOBA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 11,843,228<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ATL\u00c1NTICO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 10,879,947<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

BOLIVAR<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 9,425,099<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SUCRE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5,241,510<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MAGDALENA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4,670,485<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

LA GUAJIRA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3,553,825<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CESAR<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,791,528<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

<\/td>\n\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 48,405,622<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

En Atl\u00e1ntico, Barranquilla tiene el mayor n\u00famero de facturas afectadas en este departamento: 5 millones 72 mil 96 (5\u00b4072.096); en C\u00f3rdoba, el municipio de Ayapel, (496.716); en Bol\u00edvar, Cartagena (3\u00b4425.212), en Magdalena, Santa Marta (1\u00b4462.524); en Sucre, San Onofre (563.222; en La Guajira, Maicao (1\u00b4289.976); y en el Cesar, Valledupar (618.296).<\/p>\n

Distribuci\u00f3n por departamentos de los Principales Municipios atendidos por<\/b> Electricaribe que presentaron irregularidades en la distribuci\u00f3n de recursos FOES<\/b><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/b><\/p>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE ATL\u00c1NTICO<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

BARRANQUILLA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 30,308,548,531<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

52%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SOLEDAD<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 8,217,609,600<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

14%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MALAMBO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6,287,328,643<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SABANAGRANDE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,853,927,993<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SANTO TOMAS<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,852,937,612<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE CORDOBA<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

LORICA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$ 10,683,367,807<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MONTERIA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 6,417,352,905\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

PUERTO LIBERTADOR<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,800,541,679\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

AYAPEL<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,216,003,557\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CERETE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,156,244,395\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE BOLIVAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CARTAGENA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$ 19,046,778,893<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

46%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MARIA LA BAJA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,759,528,505<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ARJONA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,510,449,225<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MAGANGUE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,927,951,137<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MAHATES<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,559,861,036<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE MAGDALENA<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SANTA MARTA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 8,203,984,621<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CIENAGA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,699,777,846<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

13%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ZONA BANANERA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,460,951,839<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ALGARROBO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,009,304,051<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SANTA ANA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 925,739,084<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE SUCRE<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SAN ONOFRE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,453,770,215<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MAJAGUAL<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,324,552,139<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

SUCRE<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,730,252,657<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

9%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

OVEJAS<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,456,534,576<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

TOLUVIEJO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,331,089,160<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE LA GUAJIRA<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

MAICAO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7,935,050,036<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

43%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

RIOHACHA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4,393,836,621<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ALBANIA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,142,613,030<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

DIBULLA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,109,335,841<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

HATONUEVO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 784,517,968<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

DEPARTAMENTO DE CESAR<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Municipio<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0Diferencia<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

% Dif<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

VALLEDUPAR<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 2,602,800,559\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CHIRIGUANA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,989,810,743\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

CHIMICHAGUA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,878,798,422\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

15%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

ASTREA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 1,791,320,788\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

14%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

EL PASO<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

-$\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 978,393,435<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8%<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

*Revisadas m\u00e1s de 56 millones de facturas, se encontr\u00f3 que en 48 millones se dio esta irregularidad. *Atl\u00e1ntico (con $58.466 millones), C\u00f3rdoba ($44.155 millones), Bol\u00edvar ($41.659 millones) y Magdalena ($21.317 millones), los departamentos m\u00e1s afectados. Tras concluir una indagaci\u00f3n preliminar donde se revisaron m\u00e1s de 56 millones de facturas, la Contralor\u00eda General de la Rep\u00fablica cuantific\u00f3 en $216.894 millones de pesos el monto del da\u00f1o patrimonial ocasionado por la Empresa Electricaribe al hacer uso indebido de recursos por este valor, que se le giraron para subsidiar a los usuarios con… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":23557,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2,75],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-actualidad","category-destacada"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23556\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23557"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/revistazetta.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}